[VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.6.1-incubating

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view

[VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.6.1-incubating

Ufuk Celebi-2
Please vote on releasing Apache Flink (incubating) 0.6.1-incubating.

This will be the second release of the Apache Flink project under the
Incubator. Besides minor bug fixes, this release addresses issues raised by
Justin Mclean regarding the LICENSE and NOTICE files of the previous
0.6-incubating release.

Vote on [hidden email]:

Vote result (4 binding +1s, no -1s):

The tag to be voted on is release-0.6.1-rc0 (commit 0d3f3a1):

The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:

Release artifacts are signed with the following key:

The staging repository for this release can be found at:

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Flink 0.6.1-incubating.

The vote will be open for at least 72 hours until:

Wednesday, September 19, 7:00 am (PDT, UTC-7) or 4:00 pm (CEST, UTC+2)

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.6.1-incubating
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...


The Apache Flink Team
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.6.1-incubating

Ufuk Celebi-2
Thanks for taking the time to review and vote on this release. The vote passes with 3 binding +1s and no -1s.

The binding +1s were from:
Henry Saputra
Alan Gates
Justin Mclean

We'll now move the artifacts to Apache mirrors.


The Apache Flink Team

On 22 Sep 2014, at 05:58, Justin Mclean <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi,
> +1 binding
> Here's what I checked
> - Vote good
> - artefact has incubating in name
> - MD5 and signatures correct
> - NOTICE and LICENSE good with a couple of minor issues (see below)
> - All source files have correct headers
> - No unexpected binary files in source package
> - can compile from source package
> Some minor things perhaps you can look at fixing in next release.
> - "depends on and/or bundles" make it hard to review and what you need to add to license depends on it it bundled or not. Any chance you could just list the MIT/BSD bundled bits in LICENSE. I assume this was done so that you didn't need separate LICENSE/NOTICE files for the source and binary releases?
> - Specify version of bootstrap used. From a quick glance look like you have multiple versions ie 3.1.0 and 3.1.1. As bootstrap changed license around this time it would useful to list the version number.
> - Looks like you may have multiple versions of jQuery as well eg (flink-0.6.1-incubating/flink-runtime/resources/web-docs-infoserver/js/jquery-1.10.2.js and flink-0.6.1-incubating/flink-clients/resources/web-docs/js/jquery-2.1.0.js). These versions are not mentioned in LICENSE.
> - May be missing a licence for normalise.css (see comment in /flink-0.6.1-incubating/flink-clients/resources/web-docs/css/bootstrap.css). Not sure what's required here.
> - May be misisng a licence for sizzle.js (see comment at head of flink-0.6.1-incubating/flink-runtime/resources/web-docs-infoserver/js/jquery.js
> ). Not sure what's required here.
> - May not need flink-0.6.1-incubating/flink-clients/resources/web-docs/img/StratosphereLogo.png? Or should that be changed to be a Flink logo?
> Thanks,
> Justin
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]